Thursday, February 28, 2008
See this ASTALAVISTA.com Article. (or the Times Online Source Article) for a glimpse of Microsoft's ongoing lax security. Sorry Bill, I love you but something needs to be done. ' Glad I don't use HotMail!!!
BTW: Rendering in Revit 2009 is "too much perfect"... Thanks ADSK for Pimping My Revit!!! Images soon...
Friday, February 15, 2008
I will get into more of the items in depth, but I thought you'd like to see the images above ASAP!!!
Soon the Revit Architecture web site will be updated with Revit Architecture 2009 info...HERE, I think.
Thursday, February 14, 2008
First of all I did not come up with this but I'll take credit (no pun initially intended) if you want to send me a check!!! OK here we go:
Create a new drafting view and place some text in it. Maybe the text says:
IF YOU WANT TO SAVE THE PROJECT THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS (NO SHIT) PER YEAR THEN DO EACH DAY'S LAST SAVE TO CENTRAL FROM THIS VIEW.
-Perhaps you'll write your own blurb!!!
Now this next step is the most important and it’s getting 'buy-in' from the whole team: HAVE THEM ACTUALLY FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTION OF SAVING TO CENTRAL FROM THAT VIEW!!! Remember to close all hidden windows as well!!!
You don't know how to get buy-in? Here's a trick I like; just understand that you may get laughed at when you say that saving 15 seconds at opening can save $1,000 but let them laugh, you'll have the last and best laugh in about 1 minute!!!
1) Have a meeting with the Revit team and make sure your bosses are present. The more bosses the better!
2) Tell them that you have a way to save thousands of dollars (and use my name, if you like!!!)
3) Do this math on a large white-board or paper if you can, if not it's ok:
Revit projects average between 15 seconds and 1 1/2 minutes to generate the on-screen geometry during opening a file ...So let's use an average of 1 minute and let's say there are 5 people on the team:
(1x5=5 minutes per open) x 2 times a day [morning & after lunch] = 10 minutes a day. Hmmm I see where this is going...but wait it gets better!!!
10x5 = 50 minutes a week ...it's getting more clear and approaching impressive...
50 x 50 weeks = 2,500 minutes or 41.667 Hours a year (yes I said HOURS!!!) Now are you impressed? Wait!!! There’s one more thing... The big bosses always like this and they usually get the team members to buy in after hearing this:
41.667 x Billable Rate (maybe $100, or more an hour) at 100 per hr. = $4,167.00 per large project saved a year by this dumb, yet brilliant workflow enhancement... Oh and the small projects usually average 15 seconds saved = $1,000.00 a year +/-... Not bad for low profit margin projects too!!! Saving all this money for doing what we have to do anyways!!! That's strangely amazing!!!
No one's laughing at this anymore, huh?
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
From the AUGI posting: Click Me!!!
The "Factory says: This is one place where you have to follow the rules.
Revit's internal calculations do not like very large coordinate numbers. There are many number systems used in an app like Revit, some for calculating values, some for driving the display, etc. In some cases these systems differ in the precision of the numbers they can use.
When numeric values are small, these differences in precision are insignificant. When numbers get large, the differences while still small on a percentage basis become large enough to effect the results of display and operations. Thus, it is important to keep your Revit project near Revit's origin. (near means within 1 mile/1.6km) Revit's origin is near the center of the space made by the elevation symbols in the default template.
* Always build your building near the starting point of the default template.
* Model it with Project North pointing directly up. (lay it out as you would have it appear on sheets)
* If you are using a dwg based site, Link your site file Center To Center.
* Move or rotate the SITE under your project until it is correctly positioned relative to the building. (do not move or rotate the project itself).
* Use the Acquire Coordinates tool and pick the site.
This will set your project's shared coordinated to those of the dwg's wcs. True North will be the dwg's Y axis. Now your building knows where the dwg 0,0 is, but it can still record its own information in well behaving small numbers. It knows and can orient to either True North, or Project North. Once the shared coordinates are set, subsequent imports can be made origin to origin using shared coordinates."
Another fine (merely excellent) asset is one of TG's posts Found Here!!!
This should be a good start...To be continued (with pictures most likely!!!)...
Monday, February 04, 2008
Thanks to all who participated and to those who provided feedback. Perhaps ADSK will let me do more sessions in the future!!!
Even though there were preconceived notions as to the benefit of this session the reality was that it was (and is) a forum for positive change and inspired a lot of both thought and action...Without much further ado: Here's that feedback... (yes, it's a bit of an ego trip, but honestly it illustrates what not only I have to offer our world of BIM but what all of you bring to bare; as I see the results here as speaking as a microcosm of the entirety of the Revit community, illustrating the need and usefulness of pushing the envelope (sometimes in a confrontational manner, in order to get people's open listening)... BTW: I especially love the comment "Brilliant"!!! I think it was a brilliant session too...
- Have you heard of AU Unplugged before arriving in Las Vegas?
Yes -14 (74%)
No- 5 (26%)
No Answer- 0
2. Did you vote for any session to be included in the AU Unplugged scheduled?
Yes –6 (32%)
No Answer- 0
- Please rate the following on a scale from 1 to 10. (a-e)
a. Overall satisfaction with this session. 8.68
b. Format of this session. 8.89
c. Session leader’s knowledge of topic. 9.05
d. Sessions leader’s effort to engage participants 9.31
e. The benefit or value (information, contacts, etc.) 8.73
You gained from this session.
- Would you recommend this session or one similar format to others?
Yes –18 (95%)
No- 1 (5%)
No Answer- 0
5. What did you most like about this session?
Interactive, open, honest
Open, honest, healthy
Discussion and idea flow
Wide Spectrum of personalities/experience that attended
Free discussion and debate
The open discussion and knowledge of the attendees
Interactive rather than just listening
6. What did you least like about this session?
Off topic at times
The group was not a good match for the topic
Hw at times people pulled the conversation to the technical
Schedule conflict w/classes
Not enough seats
Could talk express my thought without stepping as others
Longer more session
I think the idea is great
More unplugged sessions
More of them
Schedule times to not conflict with added perhaps as breakfast and lunch sessions
Publicize and list schedule in augi daily sheet Just keep doing it